A values-led approach resisting automatic hierarchy and predefined bundles of obligation.
Back to the glossaryConsent & relationships
Relationship anarchy
An approach that questions default relationship hierarchies and lets each connection develop through explicit values and agreements rather than prescribed categories.
Consent & relationships
In brief
Relationships built deliberately rather than from a preset ladder.
Relationship anarchy treats labels such as romantic partner, friend and primary as descriptions rather than automatic packages of rights. People decide what care, commitment, intimacy or practical entanglement belongs in each relationship. It does not mean absence of responsibility, agreement or communication.
Polyamorous practice avoiding formal rank; it overlaps with but is not identical to relationship anarchy.
Polyamory that often preserves personal independence and avoids merging households or finances.
Explicit or practical priority assigned to some relationships over others.
Questioning default packages
Conventional labels may imply expectations about time, exclusivity, cohabitation, sex, holidays or decision-making. Relationship anarchy invites people to choose these elements separately.
Rejecting defaults does not require rejecting commitment. A person may make deep, durable promises while declining conventional rank or ownership language.
Autonomy and mutual responsibility
Autonomy means each person directs their choices; it does not mean acting without regard for foreseeable impact. Honest information is needed where another person's health, time or consent depends on it.
Every relationship participant can set boundaries and leave incompatible arrangements. No philosophy creates entitlement to intimacy or exemption from keeping agreements.
Power still exists
Marriage, housing, parenting, disability support, finances and public recognition can create practical hierarchy even when nobody uses hierarchical labels. Naming these effects helps make choices more informed.
Equal dignity does not require identical time or resources. Fairness is negotiated in context rather than measured by a universal formula.
Evidence and terminology
Relationship-anarchy-specific research remains limited and is often included within broader CNM studies. Community usage also varies across countries and networks.
The label should therefore be treated as a self-description, not a prediction of behaviour, relationship quality or willingness to connect.
Non-graphic examples
What the umbrella may include
- A friendship receives long-term caregiving commitment without becoming romantic.
- Partners choose separate finances despite emotional closeness.
- Someone discusses practical couple privilege rather than denying it.
- Each relationship negotiates its own privacy and time expectations.
- A person declines hierarchy while still honouring specific promises.
Reviewed 30 August 2026
Keep exploring.
This detailed field note uses the best available evidence without treating one community sample as universal. Evidence limits and UK context are stated where relevant.
Prepared by The UK Kink Guide editorial team. Read the evidence and review methodology.
Found an error or important omission? See how to report a correction.
Explore all 268 entries