Common term for digitally sending an unsolicited genital image; specific legal definitions may be narrower.
Cyberflashing
Sending or showing an unsolicited genital image through digital means. In England and Wales, the specific offence has defined intention or recklessness requirements and is narrower than every unwanted sexual image.
UK law & digital life
In brief
Unsolicited genital images are a consent violation, with offence tests varying by jurisdiction.
Section 66A of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, inserted by the Online Safety Act 2023, covers intentionally sending or giving a genital photograph or film intending alarm, distress or humiliation, or for sexual gratification while reckless about those effects. Other communications, sexual and safeguarding offences may apply in different facts or UK nations.
In-person or remote live conduct governed by different offence provisions.
Non-consensual taking, creating, threatening or sharing images of the depicted person.
Separate obligations on regulated services to reduce exposure to priority illegal content.
England and Wales offence
The offence focuses on a photograph or film of genitals and specified purpose or recklessness. 'Unsolicited' is useful ordinary language but is not the complete statutory test.
It carries a maximum two-year prison penalty and can attract notification requirements in specified circumstances. CPS guidance should be checked for current application.
Consent and digital design
A dating match, sexual conversation or prior image exchange does not imply consent to receive genital content. Ask explicitly before sending and accept no without negotiation.
Device-to-device features, disappearing messages and previews can expose recipients unexpectedly. Product filters help but do not transfer responsibility from the sender.
Other jurisdictions and conduct
Scotland and Northern Ireland may prosecute relevant conduct under different sexual or communications provisions. Live video, non-genital intimate images and repeated harassment also need their own analysis.
Cross-border sending raises jurisdiction questions; the sender's and recipient's locations and applicable statutes can matter.
Response and reporting
Recipients can block the sender, report through the platform and preserve non-explicit contextual evidence such as usernames and timestamps. Police or specialist services can advise on evidence handling.
Do not blame a recipient for opening a message or using a dating service. If the depicted person may be under 18, avoid saving or forwarding and seek specialist instructions.
Non-graphic examples
What the umbrella may include
- Asking before sending any genital image.
- Receiving an unsolicited image through a dating app.
- Reporting the sender and preserving account details.
- Recognising live exposure as a separate legal question.
- Avoiding downloads when the depicted age is uncertain.
Reviewed 30 August 2026
Keep exploring.
This detailed field note uses the best available evidence without treating one community sample as universal. Evidence limits and UK context are stated where relevant.
Prepared by The UK Kink Guide editorial team. Read the evidence and review methodology.
Found an error or important omission? See how to report a correction.
Explore all 268 entries